100   ^a20190212d2018    k  y0porb0103    ba
101 0 ^aeng
102   ^aPT
200 1 ^aTowards a single capital markets supervisor in the EU^ethe proposed extension of ESMA’S supervisory powers^fKaterina Lagaria
320   ^aBibliografia pág. 59-61
330   ^a1. Introduction. 2. ESMA’s existing mandate. 2.1 ESMA’s responsibilities and objectives. 2.2 ESMA’s existing direct supervisory powers. 2.3 The supervisory state of affairs under the Capital Markets Union and Banking Union agendas. 3. The case for centralised supervision of EU capital markets. 3.1 The proposed extension of ESMA’s powers under the CMU agenda. 3.2 Objections to a single capital markets supervisor. 4. Potential drivers behind the proposed shift towards centralised supervision of EU capital markets. 4.1 Some theoretical background. 4.2 Exogenous factors. 4.3 Endogenous factors. 5. Concluding remarks
461  1^tRevista de concorrência e regulação^cCoimbra^bAlmedina^vA. 9, n.º 33-34 (jan.-jun. 2018)^pp. 39-61
606   ^aDireito comunitário
606   ^aSupervisão
606   ^aDireito financeiro
606   ^aRegulação financeira
700  1^aLagaria,^bKaterina
920 n
921 a
922 a
923  
924  
925  
931 20190212
932 d
933 2018
934     
935 k  
936 y
937 0
938 ba