100   ^a20160719d2016    k  y0porb0103    ba
101 0 ^apor
102   ^aPT
200 1 ^aGuilt and the time of consciousness^fMaria Fernanda Palma
330   ^aThe present study takes the question of how conscience should be understood in matters of legal and criminal liability and the question if conscience is, in effect, precondition for such liability, as a starting point. With respect to this aim, it is analysed to which extent neuroscientific discoveries about (what might be) the psychobiological referents of conscience, on the one hand, and Philosophy of mind and language, on the other hand, can condition both the normative criteria of criminal law and its application. While maintaining that the values and criteria of the law itself should equally be taken into account in the general discussion on conscience, it is reaffirmed that law needs to be open to the questioning of its traditional solutions on the basis of data from Philosophy and Science
461  1^tAnatomia do crime^cCoimbra^bAlmedina^vN.º 3 (jan.-jun. 2016)^pp. 11-30
606   ^aAnatomia do crime
606   ^aConsciência
606   ^aCausalidade da consciência
606   ^aDualismo cartesiano
606   ^aCulpa
606   ^aResponsabilidade criminal
700  1^aPalma,^bMaria Fernanda
920 n
921 a
922 a
931 20160719
932 d
933 2016
935 k  
936 y
937 0
938 ba