100   ^a20150109d2013    k  y0porb0103    ba
101 0 ^apor
102   ^aPT
200 1 ^a<The >proposed Directive on multi-territorial licensing for online music^eis competition a good idea?^fNuno Sousa e Silva
330   ^a: Introduction 1. Collective Management Organizations. 1.1 What are CMOs? 1.2. Advantages/Justifications for CMOs. 1.3. Concerns under 102 TFEU: abuse of dominant position. 1.4. Concerns under 101. 1.4.1. Earlier framework. 1.4.2. IFPI/ Simulcasting. 1.4.3. CISAC. 2. The Commission proposal. 2.1. Scope. 2.1.1. Online vs. Offline. 2.1.2. Online rights (?). 2.1.3 Copyright vs. Neighbouring rights. 2.1.4 Music vs. other works. 2.2.The model - how is this to work? 3.Two models for CMOs. 3.1. CMOs as natural monopolies. 3.2. Allocative efficiency vs. Creative efficiency. Conclusion
461  1^tRevista de concorrência e regulação^cCoimbra^bAlmedina^x1647-5801^vA. 4, n.º 16 (out.-dez. 2013)^pp. 29-52
606   ^aConcorrência e regulação 
606   ^aMúsica
606   ^aInternet
606   ^aPropriedade intelectual
606   ^aDireito da concorrência
606   ^aDirectiva comunitária
700  1^aSilva,^bNuno Sousa e
920 n
921 a
922 a
923  
924  
925  
931 20150109
932 a
933 2013
934     
935 k  
936 y
937 0
938 ba