100   ^a20120912d2012    k  y0porb0103    ba
101 0 ^aeng
102   ^aDE
200 1 ^a<The >operation of ne bis in idem in the application of European Union competition law rules across the European Union^erecent developments in the light of the Toshiba case^fMichele Messina
330   ^aThe recent judgment of the Court of Justice in the Toshiba case, originating from a preliminary ruling from the Regional Court in Brno, clarified some important issues concerning the relationship between the European Commission and the national competition authorities with regard to their actions in the application of European Union and national competition law rules respectively, and the operation of ne bis in idem within the European Union. The aim of the article is to highlight the most important findings like the confirmation of the Walt Wilhelm ruling with regard to the parallel application of European Union and national competition law and the operation of the principle of ne bis in idem.
461  1^tERA Forum^cTrier^bERA^d[2000]-    ^vV. 13, n.º 2 (Agost. 2012)^pp. 163-171
606   ^aCarta dos direitos fundamentais da União Europeia
606   ^aDireito da concorrência
606   ^aDireito comunitário
606   ^aDireito nacional
700  1^aMessina,^bMichele
920 n
921 a
922 a
923  
924  
925  
931 20120912
932 a
933 2012
934 9999
935 k  
936 y
937 0
938 ba
966   ^lCEJ^sPP.249^120120912