100   ^a20111017d2011    k  y0porb0103    ba
101 0 ^aeng
102   ^aPT
200 1 ^aShould the dominance test have been changed?^fIoannis Kokkoris
330   ^aEven though the legal substantive test has been changed from the "dominance test" to the SIEC in the Recast ECMR, and thus would appear to rectify the "gap" in the European Community merger regime, the occurrences of such "gap" cases may not cease under national laws that still adhere to the traditional dominance test. This paper will address initially through case law analysis the issue of mergers leading to non-coordinated effects in oligopolistic markets ("non-collusive oligopolies" or "gap" cases); examine how the legal substantive test deals with non-collusive oligopolies; and identify such cases in the current case law.
461  1^tRevista de concorrência e regulação^cCoimbra^bAlmedina^d2010^x1647-5801^vA. 2, n.º 5 (Jan./Mar. 2011)^pp. 57-86
606   ^aDireito comunitário da concorrência
606   ^aMercado europeu
606   ^aRegulação da concorrência
700  1^aKokkoris,^bIoannis
920 n
921 a
922 a
923  
924  
925  
931 20111017
932 a
933 2011
937 0
938 ba
966   ^lCEJ^sPP.270^120111017